In light of the ongoing strife in Ferguson, Missouri, this prayer, and extended introduction, were offered in worship. Continue reading
Following the Story:
Last week: Ruth 2 - Ruth meets Boaz, a wealthy farmer and relative. Naomi and Ruth come up with a plan to ensure their well-being.
This week: Ruth 3 - Ruth and Naomi put in a plan in motion that will ensure their security.
Next week: Ruth 4 - Ruth marries Boaz, and Naomi once again finds joy.
Two weeks ago I offered three perspectives on the value of the book of Ruth. One was that it spoke of abundance and scarcity. Another was that it tells the story of an ancestor of David. The third one is that it is a great story that is one of the only Bible books that focuses on a woman—and more than that, it’s driven by not just one, but two female main characters, Ruth and Naomi. The significance of this last bit cannot be overstated, because the Bible is, fundamentally, an “androcentric” work, meaning that it focuses primarily on men. Of this there can be no doubt.
Following the Story:
Last week: Ruth 1 - Naomi and her daughters-in-law are left destitute by the death of their husbands. Ruth resolves to stay with Naomi, and the two return to Bethlehem from the land of Moab.
This week: Ruth 2 - Ruth meets Boaz, a wealthy farmer and relative. Naomi and Ruth come up with a plan to ensure their well-being.
Next week: Ruth 3 - Ruth attracts the notice of Boaz, who resolves to marry her in accordance with religious law and custom.
There’s a fine line between “coincidence” and “Providence”. Coincidence is when something happens to you unexpectedly conveniently, like hitting nothing but green lights on a drive through town, or the mailman showing up just as you walk out to check the mail, or the store having an endcap sale for exactly the item you needed but had no idea where to find. Providence, on the other hand, is coincidence colored by the conviction that God has instigated it. The fine line comes in discerning when an event is one, and not the other.
Following the Story
This week: Ruth 1 (Naomi and her daughters-in-law are left destitute by the death of their husbands. Ruth resolves to stay with Naomi, and the two return to Bethlehem from the land of Moab.)
Next week: Ruth 2 (Ruth meets Boaz, a wealthy farmer and relative. Naomi and Ruth come up with a plan to ensure their well-being.) Continue reading
The Narrative Lectionary is a relatively new, four-year cycle of readings designed to familiarize congregations with the Bible “Story”. The readings follow the academic year: Labor Day through Memorial Day, and each Sunday features a single, “required” preaching text and a supplementary text (Gospel when the main one isn’t, and a Psalm when the main text is). The readings begin in Genesis and extend through Revelation, switching from Old Testament to New Testament in Advent, and from the Gospels to the rest of the NT after Easter. Summer preaching content is also suggested, including a series on Ruth that will be offered at St. Luke’s during the first four Sundays of August (2014). The pastor’s message in the August Family Gram offered a more in-depth presentation of this material, so it is copied here in its entirety. Continue reading
Scripture: Genesis 29:15-28
Back in May, I disappeared for a week from the office so that I could attend a preaching conference in Minneapolis. The event was stuffed with preaching “rock stars” the UCC’s own Walter Brueggemann, but few of the speakers stuck as deeply in my memory as Craig Barnes, the current president of Princeton Theological Seminary, who preached on the Leah and Rachel text in Genesis. Barnes reminded us of what we all know: Jacob wanted Rachel, but he got Leah. That pattern persisted for his whole life, extending even to his favoritism for the two children Rachel birthed, Joseph and Benjamin. Barnes then suggested that we all have Leahs and Rachels in our lives. Our Rachels are the things we desire; the things we want; the things we think we really need if we are to achieve happiness. Conversely, our Leahs are what we end up with—the things we accept only grudgingly, if at all, that we wear around our necks like millstones. Continue reading
Scriptures: Psalm 145:8-14; Matthew 11:16-19, 25-30
Even as the last week saw the annual remembrance of our country’s birth, it also saw a flurry of activity surrounding what it means to be a person of faith in America. In an interview that most interpret as preparatory for another run at the White House, Secretary Hillary Clinton was asked in an interview to identify her favorite book. Her response was, “the Bible.” In a much more widely covered story, the so-called “Christian” craft chain, Hobby Lobby (along with a less well-known company) won its case in front of the Supreme Court in which it asked for an exemption from the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that employers provide full insurance coverage for contraception. The basis for their lawsuit was that four of 20 FDA-approved forms of contraception conflict with their religious convictions, because they think those four forms don’t prevent conception, but rather cause abortion.
I’m not inclined to get into the merits of the Hobby Lobby case, nor am I inclined to engage in debating whether Hillary was simply offering a calculated political answer. I am interested, however, in how these two events begin to illustrate our nation’s increasingly uneasy relationship with religion—particularly Christianity, since no one really talks about anything BUT Christianity (that’s another sermon entirely). Continue reading
Scriptures: Matthew 10:24-39; Genesis 4:1-12
If I had to hazard a guess, I would say that since December 14, 2012, Jeremiah 31:15 has seen its use in worship increase more than anything else in the Bible. It reads, “Thus says the LORD: A voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and bitter weeping. Rachel is weeping for her children; she refuses to be comforted for her children, because they are no more.” The increased use of this passage comes because the Sandy Hook massacre happened on that date, and ever since, it seems we haven’t really stopped weeping. Continue reading
Scripture: Psalm 8:1-9
I’ve been told that the Nebraska Sandhills are a favorite spot of stargazers across the nation because there, at night, you can see more stars, and those stars more brightly, than you can almost anywhere else in the United States. I’ve had that experience, although it was during a camel trek in the Negev Desert in Israel, so I know what people mean. When you’re in an arid place like that, it’s almost as if the number of stars in the sky doubles, or triples, or grows by an even larger factor. Stars you never imagined existing suddenly spring into view. The colors of stars are more vivid, the constellations are easier to trace, and the starlight is so bright it can make you squint if you close your eyes for a bit first. The sight of all those stars also fills you with an almost overwhelming sense of your own insignificance in the grand expanse of the cosmos—but this isn’t a bad thing. Continue reading
Scriptures: 1 Corinthians 123b-13; Acts 2:1-21 (also 1 Corinthians 13)
In the well-known and beloved 13th chapter of 1 Corinthians, the Apostle Paul expounds upon the nature of love in a way that has come to be associated with weddings. You all know the refrain: “Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth” and so on. It’s a nice sentiment, and decent advice about love for any couple entering into wedded bliss. The only problem is, I bet we mostly remember the “love is” part, and pay less attention to the way the passage opens: “If I speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.” This section, if properly understood, helps readers understand what Paul is getting at, and it’s about more than just what love is and is not. Continue reading